wsbdaily | Tue, 20 Dec 2022 03:11:26 EST Where you find Tomorrow’s Hot Stocks Yesterday! 

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE)

Summary & Charts

News

The latest news about Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

The Motley Fool | 2022-12-05 14:10:14

Why Intercontinental Exchange Stock Jumped 13.3% in November

The company that runs the NYSE posted solid Q3 earnings

Business Wire | 2022-11-28 16:30:00

Intercontinental Exchange Chair & CEO Jeffrey C. Sprecher to Present at the Goldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference on December 6

ATLANTA & NEW YORK--( BUSINESS WIRE )--Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (NYSE:ICE), a leading global provider of data, technology, and market infrastructure, announced today that Jeffrey C. Sprecher, Chair and CEO, will present at the Goldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference. The presentation will take place on Tuesday, December 6 at 1:00 pm ET. The presentation will be available live and in replay via webcast and can be accessed in the investor relations and media section of ICE's website at http://ir.theice.com/.

Zacks Investment Research | 2022-11-25 10:32:17

Why You Should Stay Invested in Intercontinental (ICE) Stock

A compelling portfolio, expansive risk management services, strategic buyouts, solid balance sheet and effective capital deployment continue to drive Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).

Zacks Investment Research | 2022-11-22 11:17:32

5 Securities and Exchanges Stocks to Gain From Increased Trading

Product innovation, increased market volatility and a strategic economic market model are expected to aid Securities and Exchanges stocks like ICE, CME, CBOE, NDAQ and MKTX. However, compliance with regulations remains a challenge.

Seeking Alpha | 2022-11-15 14:49:58

Why I'm Bullish On Intercontinental Exchange

Intercontinental Exchange continues to do extremely well despite macroeconomic headwinds. The company's exchange business and fixed income segments are more than offsetting weakness in mortgage services.

Seeking Alpha | 2022-11-11 12:24:37

Intercontinental Exchange: Great Quality, Attractively Priced

Intercontinental Exchange is a fantastic business in a fantastic industry - a rare 'natural monopoly' whose returns are not regulated. I estimate a potential upside of 42% gain for its share price.

Seeking Alpha | 2022-11-03 17:25:04

My Top 15 High Growth Dividend Stocks For November 2022

I present my top 15 high-growth dividend stocks to consider during the month of November. The watchlist posted a gain of 9.24% in October and is down 12.32% year-to-date.

Earnings

Top Discussions

These are the top discussions over the last 24-hours that mention the ICE stock ticker symbol.

Daily Discussion Thread for December 19, 2022

**Watch WallStreetBets discuss markets on[](https://twitter.com/Official_WSB) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRPCE1kzX-JHzcAHfPSs87Q?sub_confirmation=1)** Follow [Twitter](https://twitter... Read More

9,248 comments | 0 votes

• (3 points) Who owns the twitter note? Goldman gonna end up owning Tesla and turn them into ICE vehicles
• (2 points) >ICE SAYS WILL ASSESS WHETHER IT CAN CONTINUE TO OPERATE FAIR AND ORDERLY MARKETS FOR TTF GAS HUB FROM THE NETHERLANDS ^First ^Squawk ^[@FirstSquawk](http://twitter.com/FirstSquawk) ^at ^2022-12-19 ^11:52:19 ^EST-0500

As expected, analysts don't think 2023 is going to be too exciting😂

31 comments | 0 votes

• (3 points) > Underestimating the company that did many many many things past and present before the others And now they are 5 years behind. ICE car =/= EV. Completely new tech that they are very far away from being profitable. > only edge they have is a so far seemingly bulletproof drivetrain Vertical integration, software, battery tech, scale, their entire development process. > ICE will be around always in some capacity It will be largely irrelevant for bottom line of every manufacturer within 10-15 years. > I know for a fact more companies have came to or partnered with GM for self driving tech than Tesla. Like Nikola? Let's not forget we are talking about the company that had to get bailed out by the government to survive. Same shit about to happen to them.
• (2 points) They are so damn far behind... their best case scenario is they will be making 1/4 of the cars Tesla is making today, but in 2024. And that would require them to grow EV sales by 215% a year. They won't make money on EVs until 2025 - again, best case scenario as stated by GM themselves. If anything, GM is worth just about right, if anything, it is overvalued. 2023 is going to be fucking brutal for them. And as for self driving, that's gotta be a joke. ICE cars dropping in demand every year. EVs will continue to eat into ICE sales. GM has a very very rough ride ahead of them.

Toyota Chief Says ‘Silent Majority’ Has Doubts About Pursuing Only EVs

BURIRAM, Thailand—Toyota Motor Corp. TM -0.87%decrease; red down pointing triangle President Akio Toyoda said he is among the auto industry’s silent majority in questioning whether electric vehicles s... Read More

729 comments | 0 votes

• (49 points) >You see many horse and buggies around? The difference between a car and horse/buggies is huge in terms of maintenance and price. EVs and ICE cars at the end of the day are both cars. EVs are an incremental step not a revolution.
• (22 points, 2 replies) We are shifting far too quickly to EVs. It doesn’t even pay to own one vs. an ICE where I live. I’ve owned 4 EVs or PHEVs since 2014. My next car will be a standard hybrid
• (15 points) Have you been to Africa lately? A large majority of vehicles are still running on leaded fuel. There is no way on gods green earth that they are going to transition to EVs by the time manufacturer ICE cutoff dates arrive. Not only that, but most areas not located in major cities don’t have an adequate electricity delivery infrastructure. They have frequent power outages and some rural areas depend on solar panels because they can’t be connected to the grid. The same goes pretty much for most underdeveloped and developing countries. Moving to EV is a purely first world goal/problem.
• (12 points) >Mark my words ev will be remembered like leaded gas is today. They won't be because a lot of your information is old, outdated, or just wrong. The manufacturing processes for EV's are nearly identical to those of ICE vehicles, so they do not produce significantly more greenhouse gases as they're being built. EV's are so much more efficient that it's laughable that anyone would still try to bring in something as negligible as transmission losses as an issue (especially compared to burning gas/diesel). Seriously, that point alone makes it obvious your views are based on misinformation that you're only blindly repeating. An old diesel engine is more efficient than a dedicated power station? Fucking LOL. There's a reason why we don't all have power generators at our houses/apartments. The battery production methods are not nearly as bad for the environment as they used to be. The lithium mining bit is fair, if you completely ignore what oil extraction/petroleum processing does to the environment by comparison. I will agree that regularly getting a new car every 3-5 years is absolutely bad for the environment, just like constantly replacing anything every year is bad for the environment. So yes, keeping a **modern** **car with** **working emissions equipment** is better than going out and getting an EV. But if you're already in the market for a car and have the choice to buy an EV? The EV is so much better for the environment that it's not even a comparison at this point. That old diesel with no emissions equipment that you keep referring to? It's absolutely worth replacing as soon as possible because it's so much worse for the environment.
• (10 points, 2 replies) Has it gotten more affordable in the past 5-10 years? Still about $40k It definitely has not in the past few years And the same thing can be said about ICE vehicles, they will get cheaper and even better mileage over time.
• (8 points) Current Tesla Model Y owner here giving my two cent viewpoint on EV vs Hybrid… My FIL has a plugin hybrid and his driving is less than 40 miles per day (retired). This allows him to fill up the gas engine once every 2 months. When they take long trips its 40mpg using the ICE engine. This is the sweet spot for plugin hybrids, low usage in range for EV but also no range anxiety. This doesn’t work well for a younger family with all the driving to activities. Our Tesla is great for city and trips are good but planning and timing takes more thought than a ICE or plugin hybrid. We would love to get a plugin hybrid SUV or a minivan as long as it’s EV range is a usable ~100 miles. That would drastically reduce petrol costs driving youth around all day. We use the model Y right now to reduce petrol but that only works well for 4 people, and our family is larger. If Hyundai releases a Palasade SUV plugin hybrid with 100 miles EV range I predict it will be one of their beet selling vehicles.
• (8 points) A gas power plant’s efficiency is >50%, significantly higher than an ICE (~30%). Transmission of electricity is actually quite efficient, losses are only ~5%.
• (7 points) Not to mention round trip efficiency of EV vehicles is that much higher than ICE that even a dirtier source at generation can be cleaner than ICE. That and emissions from an ICE vehicle are generated typically in population centres/around your family home, etc. Where as for an EV those emissions are generated at a power station. So even if its not clean energy, its still cleaner.
• (6 points) There are some of us that prefer the involvement of an ICE car. I like to consider myself an automotive enthusiast and I know hundreds of others just like me, who are not saying that their next car will be an electric car. Here I am wondering which manual ICE car to buy next, electric cars don't even cross my mind. So they may have something there.
• (6 points) While that is true, they have not become more affordable compared to ICE vehicles which have also retained their price points. That is the big hurdle EV's need to climb
• (5 points, 3 replies) Almost every legacy automaker have already pledged to go fully EV by 2035-2040. Some countries are outright banning ICE vehicle sales as soon as 2025. EV's have come a long way and will continue to. With the $7,500 EV tax credit available in America, it would make very little sense to purchase an ICE vehicle in the upcoming years. I'm not sure where the low-range equation is coming from but that hasn't been true for quite some time. Many EV's have 200 miles, minimum, these days. The average person doesn't drive 200 miles per day (mostly 40 miles). The charging infrastructure is the biggest problem but for homeowners who own an EV, all they have to do is spend $1,000 for an EV charger in their home and it will charge 30 miles per hour. They'll never need to charge their vehicle unless they are going on a road trip. Some offices, new housing developments, new apartments, etc., are already building EV chargers in their parking garage.
• (4 points) Ford Model T was already out back then. Also the difference in upkeep between cars and horses were huge. The difference between EVs and ICE is rather small. 1-2 Services a year will not pursue the people rather than the price.
• (4 points) Where will people charge their cars? That's the single biggest hurdle behind the price of the car. Who will pay to install all of those charges? Can the local electrical grid support it? These are important questions that aren't being answered. Government supported charging infrastructure will go to wealthier neighborhoods first while poorer people get left behind. At the same time, ICE vehicles are getting phased out, gas is getting more expensive, the ICE cars that are left become more expensive, and parts for ICE cars become harder to find. It's going to be a rough time for poor people.
• (3 points) > Proven, mature and reliable tech, maintenance and parts availability ICE is far from reliable. It has so many moving parts that maintenance is very costly. Most ICE cars have at least one significant failure during an average term of ownership (8 years). Good EVs have been around for at least a decade now, which is longer than the average term of ownership, and they are way more reliable. The parts availability might indeed be lower, but you also need new parts way less often, so that kinda evens out. > longer range - fill up tank in a few minutes and much This is not a problem in daily use. 99% of the population doesn't drive more than 200 miles daily. As for refuelling, most people rarely recharge on the road, and if you just charge at home or work you save a lot of time not having to refuel. > much longer range in cold climate If this was truly a problem, EVs wouldn't be as popular in Norway as they are. As long as your EV has 250+ miles of range, you're good for almost all people. > also cheaper Only cheaper in sticker price, but much more expensive over the total term of ownership. I'm not saying that EVs are equal in every aspect, but they are equal or have beneficial trade offs in every aspect for 99% of the consumers.
• (3 points, 2 replies) Within the next 25 years? 100% it would be. It'd be quicker if ICE vehicles weren't so profitable for automakers but because they are profitable, these automakers can't just focus on EV's because they would be out of business selling them.
• (2 points) But won't that also be the same observation for ICE cars? Short-distance commuters will have less wear and tear compared to long-haul drivers.
• (2 points) Lol wtf? EVs are better than ICE in every aspect. Even after driving my dad's admittedly pretty poor EV, I can never go back to ICE. It's just such an inferior technology on every single aspect.
• (2 points) Because it makes zero sense. It requires 2x as much energy as EVs, while we already struggle to meet EV energy demand. On top of that they have lots of the same downsides as ICE cars compared to EVs. There is simply no upside to using hydrogen for personal transportation.
• (2 points) Yes, hydrogen cars are better than EVs (if you can secure a supply of cheap, clean hydrogen). EVs have two traps. One is that cars do not magically become more profitable just by switching out the engines, so the only reason to invest in EVs is if ICEs are being banned (and at that point they are just normal, low profit vehicles for everyone). The other trap is that despite their drawbacks (expensive, dirty batteries; strain on the grid; low range without technological breakthroughs) they aren't a whole lot greener than ICEs (though they are effective in moving smog out of urban areas and to the countryside). So, you are jumping through lots of hoops for little or no actual gain. If a hydrogen car worked like an ICE but was a lot greener that would be a genuine benefit. If you could make it possible for people to drive a lot less--for instance, as they do in Japan--you would also have a genuine benefit.
• (2 points) Their pledges aren't 25 years, they are 13-18. That's a relatively short time considering some of the hurdles in both manufacturing and energy production required to charge all those cars. I think the grid is the bigger issue here. Also the point isnt "ICE forever", but maybe the replacement long term won't end up being EV. That's definitely still possible.
• (2 points) >Some countries are outright banning ICE vehicle sales as soon as 2025. Source on countries that are straight up banning ICE vehicle sales by 2025?

Unusual Option Activity

Option contracts that are trading at a significantly higher volume relative to the contract's open interest. These might provide some insight into what "smart money" is doing with large volume orders.

Failures to Deliver

Each point represents the aggregate net balance of shares that failed to be delivered as of a particular settlement date.

Please note that fails-to-deliver can occur for a number of reasons on both long and short sales. Therefore, fails-to-deliver are not necessarily the result of short selling, nor evidence of abusive “naked” short selling. For more information on short selling and fails-to-deliver, see Key Points About Regulation SHO, Division of Market Regulation, and Final Rule: Short Sales.