I am playing arkk's breaish movement, and seems like it will nose dive more around 25-28 category.But I also don't want to miss any long plays. So I created a 3 leg strategy. I am looking for advice if this will work and we can get some profit out of this. 1. Short term Call sell $40-50 Strike ra... Read More

**Watch WallStreetBets discuss markets on[](https://twitter.com/Official_WSB) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRPCE1kzX-JHzcAHfPSs87Q?sub_confirmation=1)** Follow [Twitter](https://twitter... Read More

• (5 points) Short TSLA, Short ARKK
• (4 points) The Suicide Hotline is on a hiring spree... Thanks to TSLA, PLTR, and ARKK fucking shit-up

**Watch WallStreetBets discuss markets on[](https://twitter.com/Official_WSB) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRPCE1kzX-JHzcAHfPSs87Q?sub_confirmation=1)** Follow [Twitter](https://twitter... Read More

• (16 points, 2 replies) Bought PLTR at $30? *check* Bought ARKK at $130? *check* Bought ARKG at $104? *check* Save me
• (4 points) ARKK from $150 -----> $32. You're among friends here Cathy. We all make mistakes. Not usually as big as yours but...you know. At least you didn't lose 8 Billion....well not yet.
• (3 points) ARKK lower than the covid bottom.  Ms. Woods is in shambles.
• (3 points) $COIN -2.9% $ARKK -2% $AMC -3.4% $GME -2.2% $BBBY -3.2% $LCID -2.2% $RIVN -1.7% $NKLA -8.5% it's like a giant barbecue fueled with fucking morons
• (2 points) Get this paper you lil bitches. Literally any high growth high PE tech stock is easy money on puts. Or you can go super simple and short ARKK. Cathie guarantees returns!!!
• (2 points) ARKK 52 week lows

• (9 points) Even people in /r/stocks were saying stuff about going 100% ARKK to maximize their risk exposure and upside potential a couple years ago. Nobody wants to admit what maximum risk actually means until they've lost 75%+ of their portfolio's value in 2 years. Risk doesn't just mean you make more money lol.

• (2 points) I was too poor to buy puts on $TSLA, so I bought them on its little deformed twin, $ARKK

Discuss your thoughts on the market, DDs, SPACs, meme stonks, yolos, or whatever is on your mind. You can find our quality DD posts [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbetsOGs/search?sort=new&a... Read More

• (9 points) Anyone who invested in ARKK since late August 2017 is now red.
• (6 points) $COIN -2.5% $ARKK -2% $GME -2% $BBBY -3% $LCID -2.2% $RIVN -1.7% $NKLA -8.1% it's like a giant barbecue fueled with fucking morons
• (2 points) ARKK institute

These daily discussions run from Monday to Friday including during our themed posts. Some helpful links: * [Finviz](https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=spy) for charts, fundamentals, and aggregated news... Read More

• (3 points) I can't tell if you're trying to be mean, but I'll share anyways. First, I didn't say I called the top or bottom. I just try to make sense of the risk-return profile of the market. The timing happened to work out well, but again, I wasn't saying anything super actionable. Just for reference, [here is a summary of comments that kind of gave a real-time snapshot of my thought process the last couple of years.](https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/ug3sdi/just_a_friendly_reminder_that_nobody_knows_what/i6xg62p/). In regards to where I think value can be found currently, I won't give anything specific, but some ideas might be: * SPAC and high growth darlings and other ARKK-esque type companies that are now down 70%+ since mid 2021. Companies like Shopify, Spotify, square maybe are all companies that have actual business models that have been dragged down in a big way. It's up to you to do your own due diligence, and I haven't looked at any of these companies in particular, but it's a great place to look. Also note, I've been saying this since early this summer, so I've clearly been early / wrong to this point. * I'd steer clear of the "value" type names that carry a high multiple. Companies like $JNJ and $KO, for example, are trading at higher PE's than the market, but have slower growth than the market. They trade at a premium because they're perceived to be lower risk (which they probably are), but their returns will probably lag the market over the long term. * Conversely, there are still some "value" names that are still trading very cheaply. $VZ is one that comes to mind with an 8× PE ratio and pretty steady earnings. I think one of the big perceived risks is their debt load, but most of their debt is fixed rate bonds with maturities beyond 5 years. If you project interest rates to be lower 5 years from now, it could return 12% cagr over the medium term (3-5 years). There's risk with them losing customers and big capital outflows expanding their 5G network though (but that's why they're trading so cheaply). I don't own VZ. * Developed international. See the link in my top comment for the rationale there. * I think in the next couple of years, we'll see the trend of "catalyst" investing return, especially if the market churns sideways for another year. There's still plenty of reason for the market to move up. I'm not advocating going to cash or anything. But I do think now is a fine time to be diversified. I think domestic stocks, bonds, and international should see less correlation going forward (again, see my top level comment for my reasoning).

I'm 33 and about to make my first purchase in my roth IRA and was going to go with a Schwab 2060 target date index fund, which is also what's in my 401k. I've seen post made about this before, and I ... Read More

• (4 points) What you're basically seeing is that the US has had a great era of outperformance. That won't continue forever. In fact, prices already show that there's a big premium on US companies. The P/E ratio (stock price compared to profits) for the SP500 is about 20 right now. For the VXUS international index, it's 12. That means just to break even between US and international stocks, the US stocks already have to grow their profits substantially faster than international companies. So when you say that you expect the "US to always lead", that is already largely built into the current prices. Also, I disagree that there's any certainty that the US will "always lead". Think back 50 years. People might have said, "it's pretty obvious the US and the USSR (Russia) will always be the world's most powerful economies." Well, that's been half true so far, and half *very wrong*. Current projections show China GDP surpassing the US before 2030. That's a big piece of the world economy that you neglect by being US-centric. Even as recently as late 2021 people came to this sub reddit and said things like, "it's obvious that technology is going to drive the economy of the future, so I'm going all-in on ARKK". ARKK is now down 67% since January, having lost two thirds of its value. Suffice to say, you need to get over your notion to chase past returns. Over history, at times the US outperforms and at times the international stocks outperform. By going all US you increase your risk, especially by doing so at a time when the US has just had a decade-long hot streak. Nobody can predict which segment will outperform in the future, but we can certainly say that you take on more risk with no additional expected average return by putting all your eggs in one basket.